This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
You're asking, if I capture an OEM on my territory, do we know how much of the aftermarket is being serviced and how much Dodge is getting on a replacement basis? The general consensus I've heard is that Dodge would capture about 80% of the market share when it comes to original parts, meaning 80% of the time, people would replace parts with Dodge. However, did we track this using serial numbers or any other methods to confirm if we're actually capturing the market share for repeat MRO activities? No, we didn't measure that at all. I don't know anyone across the country who did that.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Let me explain. The Andersons had a lot of shaft mount gearboxes. The situation was that these used V-belt sheaves, and The Andersons were involved in grain and the fertilizer industry. The chemical used for fertilizer was very abrasive and strong, which would wear out the belts. They didn't have the maintenance staff to service the belts regularly, so it was always a hassle to keep the V-belts from failing. We worked with a local independent distributor and looked at a solution that doesn't use belts at all. It's a beltless drive with a C-face connection, known as the Dodge motorized torque arm. We conducted a survey one morning, gathered all the product information, and did interchanges. We compared the pricing of our normal shaft mount with V-belts to the motorized torque arm. Although there was an upcharge for the motorized torque arm, we demonstrated downtime savings. We documented around $100,000 in savings over a year for 15 to 20 gearboxes. They ended up purchasing all those motorized torque arms over the next year.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research