This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I would say that Nubank actually took Capital One's core idea and made it even more applicable and effective. Being digital-first allowed them to start natively. Additionally, Brazil's relatively liberal regulatory environment regarding data usage for underwriting helped. Nubank was able to iterate models and underwriting strategies more rapidly than any other company I've seen in the lending business worldwide. They are truly world-class, especially in Brazil's underwriting front.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Yes, the decision criteria are relatively constant. The goal is to make decisions that are NPV positive, subject to some level of risk worsening on the margin. The amount of risk worsening might change slightly depending on the risk appetite. For example, you might want a 10%, 30%, or 50% cushion, which can vary based on macroeconomic conditions. But the core is having a good estimate of the lifetime unit economics of the data point. It's straightforward math
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
No, he wouldn't weigh in on the model, and he wouldn't weigh in on the risk appetite. I think he respected the process. That's a core principle at Capital One - don't interfere with credit, at that can lead to negative outcomes. There is respect for the level of the unit economics and allowing the process to determine the outcomes in terms of lending.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research