This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Everything is feasible without it, but with it, the manual part is eliminated. All the tools are industry standard and can be done manually, but our clients appreciate the efficiency. We provide them with a spreadsheet of the data, and they often say thank you, as it would have taken them months otherwise. We had a case study showing the efficiency, time, and cost saved by using the machine versus a person. It was substantial, with savings between 30% and 60%, depending on the use case.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
It would be very significant. There are two things to consider. One is that all the scanning options on the market today, that I'm aware of, are quite different. We discussed this on the last call. It's very difficult to directly compare them. If you're talking about TruScan, that's probably the closest to BoxScan, but it's still a long way behind. It only has two sensors, and they're not very good. It's designed by a drilling company, not by geoscientists. The other options don't have any real direct comparison because BoxScan uses existing tools. To my knowledge, all the other scanning techniques are custom, particularly hyperspectral ones, which don't have a direct comparison. They're like a niche tool. Does that make sense?
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
For example, Core Scan just takes a big photograph and happens to pick up hyperspectral data. You can't use that data in any conventional way with mining software. You have to convert it into something else. It has a narrow scope. All of them have a very narrow scope of what they do, and the data you get from them is very niche. I'm not sure how to explain it better than that.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research