This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Let me start by saying, from a vendor-to-vendor competition standpoint, Equifax holds over 85% of the market share. From a revenue perspective, it's over 90%. Other credit bureau-type solutions probably account for 3% to 5%, with consumer permission solutions like Argyle or Plaid making up another 5% to 6%. Solutions focused on OCR, document upload, collection, and management account for another 4% to 5%. If manual verifications are included, Equifax's share drops to about 70% to 75%, with the manual piece covering the remainder.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
In five years, it's not unreasonable to say they could triple their market share. It's a real threat. Five years ago, the biggest challenge was consumer behavior and comfort with connecting accounts like this. In those five years, both consumer behavior and the technology to build these connections have come a long way. So, it's not unrealistic for them to have 15% to probably 20% market share on the high end. One big caveat is that it's highly dependent on what Equifax chooses to do from a pricing perspective going forward.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Yes, they employ a couple of different strategies for price increases. One is straightforward price increases. The other involves manipulating the product to essentially increase the price. Previously, a verifier would search for an individual by Social Security number, get a summary of employment on file, and select what they needed to verify the proper income. Revenue was left on the table because someone might select only what they needed or use it to confirm what they already believed.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.