This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
For the entire building. It's actually a pretty good deal. When I first started, it was $50 for the entire building. I remember when we doubled it to $100, everyone was shocked. But when you break it down, it's essentially free money. So, $650 is the current rate. I would guess they're probably at $800 by now. Apartments.com is essentially getting twice as much money out of every building. You pay $650 for the building, whether you have one vacancy or 30 vacancies. In the upper right-hand corner, there are sponsored ads you can buy, called boost, which allows you to get additional impressions. Zillow is quite good at targeting the right people who are most likely to rent at your building.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Now, to the next point, we did some studies where if you integrate a PMS system like Yardi, it connects well. Sophisticated companies like Greystar are good at tracking where leads originated. They use UTM codes to see where someone first looked at a property, so Zillow can get attribution credit. With the Greystar study, we found about one and a half leases per month at an average Greystar property. If you're paying $650, the cost per lease is about $425. If you're renting that building out for $3,000 a month times 12 months, you're making $36,000 and paying $450 for that lease, which gives you an 8x ROI.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Comscore is a great resource for unbiased third-party marketing data. It's excellent for tracking eyeballs, which is what we focus on when meeting with partners. We both use it. Zillow claims to be the best because they have the most site visits, while Apartments.com claims superiority due to having the most listings, which is true. They have about twice as many listings. I think Zillow has around 45,000 multifamily paid advertisers now, while Apartments.com is closer to 100,000, probably in the 90s.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research