The History of x86, ARM, & Amazon's Graviton Processor
Principal Developer Advocate at Honeycomb and Former SRE Leader at Google
inpractise.com/articles/the-history-of-x86-arm-and-amazons-graviton-processor
The History of x86, ARM, & Amazon's Graviton Processor(August 18, 2022)
Liz Fong-Jones
Principal Developer Advocate at Honeycomb and Former SRE Leader at Google
Liz is a developer advocate at Honeycomb, a SaaS observability company that competes with Datadog, New Relic, etc. Liz previously spent over 11 years at Google Cloud as a reliability engineer and leading developer advocate across SRE, devops, and infraops.
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
What is it about GCP that is unique compared to the other cloud providers?
Taking off my Honeycomb hat and putting on my former GCP employee hat, there are things that GCP does better than the competition. GCP offers you the capability of using Google's world class networking set up and capabilities. Google has lower latency and higher throughput than Amazon or Microsoft. Google pioneered and innovated TensorFlow TPUs, and there are also ideological reasons. Walmart refuse to do business with companies hosted on AWS, which subsidizes their biggest competitor.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
What's your forecast of ARM’s market share in the next five to 10 years?
I've seen analyst reports claiming 15% of Amazon's new build chips are ARM. I'm not in a position to substantiate or deny that, but it would be completely reasonable in the next five years for a majority of new data center chip deliveries to be ARM rather than X86. If we're sitting at 15% to 20% today, I don't see a reason why that's not 50% of new deliveries in five years. There is a substantial install base of X86 that may not be going away because people have their legacy payroll apps which need to run on an X86.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
If Graviton has a 20% to 35% price advantage, why doesn't everyone switch?
I wanted to correct you on something. It's no longer a 20% or 30% difference; it's more like 50% to 60%. If you compare the C6I Intel processor on AWS to the latest C7G ARM processor instance type, it's roughly a 50% to 60% price performance increase. Intel is already optimized as hard as they can, whereas it's just the beginning of the game for Graviton. We have C5 Intel powered instances and C6G instances that are 20% to 30% better price performance. Intel is not going to let itself get eclipsed, so they deliver the C6I which is 15% to 20% better than the C5.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Datadog, Open Telemetry, & A History of Observability
Principal Developer Advocate at Honeycomb and Former SRE Leader at Google
AWS Graviton’s Process Power
Amazon Web Services: EC2 Graviton Strategy
Former Senior Manager at Amazon Web Services
AWS: Containers, Kubernetes, & EC2 Stickiness
Former Senior Manager at Amazon Web Services
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2023 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.