This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I would say Procore is definitely the leader in project management. It's improved over time and is considered the dominant force in the industry. Its strengths include request for information (RFI), submittal management, field management, and drawing management.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
If there's a mistake on the plans or blueprints, Procore allows the contractor to ask questions directly to the project manager, general contractor, or architect, rather than using email. Procore was a pioneer in this area, though there are now other competitors. However, its bidding feature is not as strong.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I would say the majority are general contractors using Procore. If I were to guess, it would probably be 75% general contractors and then 25% owners and specialty subcontractors.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research