I'll give some context as to why I framed the question that way. I was looking at the reports, and Pathfinder and Guardian combined account for just about 10% of revenue, maybe less. Pathfinder has been around for almost 10 years, having been launched in 2016. So, it's not necessarily a new product. I was wondering why it hasn't taken off more.

The concept of having a centralized place to use different tools for data analysis and analytic automation is excellent. However, there are multiple challenges, such as dealing with various data formats. For instance, you have video files, mobile phone extractions, cloud extractions, and numerous documents. This requires strong technical capabilities and a broad range of analytics to analyze and contextualize these data types.

I'll give some context as to why I framed the question that way. I was looking at the reports, and Pathfinder and Guardian combined account for just about 10% of revenue, maybe less. Pathfinder has been around for almost 10 years, having been launched in 2016. So, it's not necessarily a new product. I was wondering why it hasn't taken off more.

The research and development at Cellebrite have always been strong, but translating that into a stable product is challenging. There were hiccups during the first installations. The big question is why there aren't more deployments, given the company's market presence. It's a complex product requiring substantial resources to develop, maintain, and enhance, which is why its evolution is slow.