Burford Capital, Elliott Management & Collecting vs Argentina
CEO of Latam Advisors LLC
inpractise.com/articles/burford-capital-elliott-management-and-collecting-vs-argentina
Burford Capital, Elliott Management & Collecting vs Argentina(September 21, 2023)
Sebastian Maril
CEO of Latam Advisors LLC
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
So where do we currently stand in this case?
Argentina currently has four options. Let's start with the simplest one. Ask Judge Preska for reconsideration of a ruling. It's not going to happen. I mean, if Argentina does that, it will be wasting taxpayers money, my taxpayers money because, most likely, you will pay lawyers by filing some documents that the judge will obviously reject because of what we just discussed.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
In the case, it was stated that there was sovereign immunity. Then it was said that you can't attach assets that are in the Bank of Argentina in the US, etc.
Embassies and other such entities cannot be attached. For instance, if Burford Capital wants to seize Aerolineas Argentina planes that fly to Miami and New York, it can't, because those planes are leased from an Irish company. If you want to seize Argentine sovereign assets, you have to seize the planes we own that fly domestically, not internationally. There aren't many of those. If you want to seize our battleships, even though Elliott Management was initially successful in seizing those assets, an international court later overruled their achievement. So, if you try to do that again, you will fail. We don't have many overseas assets to seize. Elliott Management's attempts to find assets prolonged this litigation. Argentina also prolonged this litigation because they found assets. This process extended the legal proceedings for over a decade until it was finalized by the new government in 2016. The YPF case has also been ongoing for eight years. Why eight years? Because when the Supreme Court said in 2020 that they wouldn't take the case, Argentina asked Judge Preska to reconsider her forum non conveniens ruling based on new evidence. To everyone's surprise, Judge Preska agreed. That took another year in court to be ruled on. When Argentina lost the forum non conveniens issue, the pretrial procedures began
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.