Acme United: First Aid Market & Cintas Competition
Former VP at Acme United
inpractise.com/articles/acme-united-first-aid-market-and-cintas-competition
Former VP at Acme United
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
I apologize, as I haven't studied the history that far back. Was their first aid business mostly in retail, like with Westcott and their scissors, or did they also have an industrial side? I'm trying to piece together the timeline.
At the time, Honeywell held the number one market share for industrial first aid kits. Johnson & Johnson had the commercial market, and Honeywell dominated the industrial side, which Acme now owns. From my perspective, Acme owns that market.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Acme claims in their presentations that they are significantly cheaper than Cintas, sometimes 30% to 50% cheaper for refills, depending on the situation. Is that accurate?
Extremely accurate.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Related Content
GVS: RPB Abrasive Blasting Respirators & Regulatory Approval
Former Director at RPB Safety
Blackline Safety: Honeywell Competition In Connected Gas Detection
Former Marketing Director at Honeywell
Veeva: Quality Vault & Product Adoption
Former Director at Veeva
Veeva: Non-Pharma Quality Vault
Former Sales Executive at Veeva
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.